Where is this coming from? Making groundedness count in the evaluation of Document VQA models
Armineh Nourbakhsh, Siddharth Parekh, Pranav Shetty, and 3 more authors
In Findings of the 2025 Annual Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NLP in a Multicultural World, Apr 2025
Document VQA models have evolved at an impressive rate over the past few years, coming close to or matching human performance on some benchmarks. We argue that common evaluation metrics used by popular benchmarks do not account for the semantic and multimodal groundedness of a model’s outputs. As a result, hallucinations and major semantic errors are treated the same way as well-grounded outputs, and the evaluation scores do not reflect the reasoning capabilities of the model. In response, we propose a new evaluation methodology that accounts for the groundedness of predictions with regards to the semantic category of the output as well as the multimodal placement of the output within the input document. Our proposed methodology is parameterized in such a way that users can configure the score to their preferences. We validate our scoring methodology using human judgment and show its potential impact on existing popular leaderboards. Through extensive analyses, we demonstrate that our proposed method produces scores that are a better indicator of a model’s robustness, and tends to give higher rewards to better-calibrated answers.